Comments for BlackHat360 http://blackhat360.com Everything Black Hat! Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:34:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 Comment on Legitimizing Your Traffic by MoneyGman http://blackhat360.com/2009/07/22/legitimizing-your-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-7183 MoneyGman Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:03:45 +0000 http://blackhat360.com/?p=92#comment-7183 The applications in this suite are outstanding! With the landing page builder, and my existing PPC marketing techniques, I've managed to increase my income by 25% in the first week alone. I also used link exchange to get some of my white hat sites indexed in hours! Powerful tools and very impressive results! The applications in this suite are outstanding! With the landing page builder, and my existing PPC marketing techniques, I’ve managed to increase my income by 25% in the first week alone. I also used link exchange to get some of my white hat sites indexed in hours! Powerful tools and very impressive results!

]]> Comment on Do Patents Point to SEO Gold? by Stanley http://blackhat360.com/2009/06/09/do-patents-point-to-seo-gold/comment-page-1/#comment-7182 Stanley Sun, 05 Jul 2009 03:44:00 +0000 http://blackhat360.com/?p=87#comment-7182 It makes sense for them to purposely patent technology they are not using or have no intention of using. Similarly, it wouldn't make sense for them to disclose highly valuable information that could be exploited by SEOs, or reverse-engineered by other SEs. It makes sense for them to purposely patent technology they are not using or have no intention of using. Similarly, it wouldn’t make sense for them to disclose highly valuable information that could be exploited by SEOs, or reverse-engineered by other SEs.

]]> Comment on Link Exchange: A Case Study Part 2 by cchance http://blackhat360.com/2009/05/08/link-exchange-a-case-study-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7175 cchance Wed, 13 May 2009 20:04:37 +0000 http://blackhat360.com/?p=51#comment-7175 ok i signed up just to ask, whats the update now that the weekend is over was looking forward to the update on monday on how things have progressed as i'm looking into buying the software but as im pretty decent at building backlinks but i want A LOT of backlinks to boost pr, would love to hear your y!linkdomain count now, and the current status of indexed pages and hits since you did this... also was wondering, the links that your showing to earn credits, how do they show up to people or is it only shown to search crawlers? ok i signed up just to ask, whats the update now that the weekend is over was looking forward to the update on monday on how things have progressed as i’m looking into buying the software but as im pretty decent at building backlinks but i want A LOT of backlinks to boost pr,

would love to hear your y!linkdomain count now, and the current status of indexed pages and hits since you did this…

also was wondering, the links that your showing to earn credits, how do they show up to people or is it only shown to search crawlers?

]]> Comment on Link Exchange: A case study by Link Exchange: A Case Study Part 2 | BlackHat360 http://blackhat360.com/2009/05/06/link-exchange-a-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-7174 Link Exchange: A Case Study Part 2 | BlackHat360 Fri, 08 May 2009 15:42:44 +0000 http://blackhat360.com/?p=40#comment-7174 [...] Welcome to BlackHat360.com (1)May 7, 2009 -- Does Domain Age Influence Ranking? (0)May 6, 2009 -- Link Exchange: A case study (0)April 30, 2009 -- What is Black Hat SEO? (0)August 5, 2008 -- The Great Duplicate Content Myth [...] [...] Welcome to BlackHat360.com (1)May 7, 2009 — Does Domain Age Influence Ranking? (0)May 6, 2009 — Link Exchange: A case study (0)April 30, 2009 — What is Black Hat SEO? (0)August 5, 2008 — The Great Duplicate Content Myth [...]

]]> Comment on The Great Duplicate Content Myth by admin http://blackhat360.com/2008/08/05/the-great-duplicate-content-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-12 admin Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:20:30 +0000 http://blackhat360.com/?p=10#comment-12 anty, not quite the whole picture. Domain age, incoming links are the reason I don't get as much traffic as wikipedia. I can almost guarantee that if my wiki clone were on an aged domain with more trust than wikipedia that I could outrank them for their own articles. Again though, there is more at work than that. anty, not quite the whole picture. Domain age, incoming links are the reason I don’t get as much traffic as wikipedia. I can almost guarantee that if my wiki clone were on an aged domain with more trust than wikipedia that I could outrank them for their own articles. Again though, there is more at work than that.

]]> Comment on The Great Duplicate Content Myth by admin http://blackhat360.com/2008/08/05/the-great-duplicate-content-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-11 admin Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:19:01 +0000 http://blackhat360.com/?p=10#comment-11 pac, check my latest article for an explanation for what you are seeing. pac, check my latest article for an explanation for what you are seeing.

]]> Comment on The Great Duplicate Content Myth by pac1984 http://blackhat360.com/2008/08/05/the-great-duplicate-content-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-10 pac1984 Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:32:32 +0000 http://blackhat360.com/?p=10#comment-10 I put up a few sites with exactly the same content and have been building them both up. They are exactly the same site on different domains. Seems that google will not allow both of them to rank well for the same term. They both rank well for different terms, but in theory they both should rank for all the terms as they are the same site! This has given me some proof in that there is some form of duplicate measure out there. Also on my blog network where i post the same article to many blogs generally only one of them will make it to the top positions but all for different terms. I put up a few sites with exactly the same content and have been building them both up. They are exactly the same site on different domains. Seems that google will not allow both of them to rank well for the same term. They both rank well for different terms, but in theory they both should rank for all the terms as they are the same site!

This has given me some proof in that there is some form of duplicate measure out there.

Also on my blog network where i post the same article to many blogs generally only one of them will make it to the top positions but all for different terms.

]]> Comment on The Great Duplicate Content Myth by » Blog Archive » The Great Duplicate Content Myth http://blackhat360.com/2008/08/05/the-great-duplicate-content-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-9 » Blog Archive » The Great Duplicate Content Myth Wed, 06 Aug 2008 02:25:58 +0000 http://blackhat360.com/?p=10#comment-9 [...] The Great Duplicate Content Myth [...] [...] The Great Duplicate Content Myth [...]

]]> Comment on The Great Duplicate Content Myth by posylane http://blackhat360.com/2008/08/05/the-great-duplicate-content-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-8 posylane Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:40:08 +0000 http://blackhat360.com/?p=10#comment-8 How much duplicate content would one have to have for Google to catch it? I am guessing the author's wiki copy only gets a few thousand hits per day because his sites have low page rank. Wiki must have a very high page rank. How much duplicate content would one have to have for Google to catch it? I am guessing the author’s wiki copy only gets a few thousand hits per day because his sites have low page rank.

Wiki must have a very high page rank.

]]> Comment on The Great Duplicate Content Myth by anty http://blackhat360.com/2008/08/05/the-great-duplicate-content-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-7 anty Tue, 05 Aug 2008 21:40:20 +0000 http://blackhat360.com/?p=10#comment-7 If I where a SE, I would compare not my 8 billion index with each site, but take popular keywords and compare my search results with each other. Given the fact that I barely see 100% identical content in the top SERPs I think they're already doing this. This makes duplicate content worthless if you want to rank for the same phrase on popular keywords. This would also explain why you only get 3-5k visitors a day when wikipedia gets millions... If I where a SE, I would compare not my 8 billion index with each site, but take popular keywords and compare my search results with each other. Given the fact that I barely see 100% identical content in the top SERPs I think they’re already doing this. This makes duplicate content worthless if you want to rank for the same phrase on popular keywords.

This would also explain why you only get 3-5k visitors a day when wikipedia gets millions…

]]>